TOGAF Agile Architecture in Practice - Three glowing digital circuit boards in blue, green, and orange stacked with light connections.

Applying TOGAF® Agile Architecture in Practice: A Clear Guide Using Landscape and the Three-Layer Structure

1. Fundamentals of TOGAF® Agile Architecture: Landscape and the Three-Layer Model

To deepen your understanding of “Developing Architecture in an Agile Way” in TOGAF®, let’s explore a practical application example.

The Architecture Landscape in TOGAF® organizes architecture along two dimensions:

  • Level of abstraction (granularity)
  • Scope of application

This concept enables teams to maintain architectural consistency—even in Agile environments.

At the core of this approach is the three-layer model:

  • Enterprise Strategic Architecture
  • Segment Architecture
  • Capability Architecture

These are not merely hierarchical layers. They form a decomposition and alignment structure that connects strategy directly to Agile delivery.

Summary Classification Model for Architecture Landscapes - TOGAF Agile Architecture in Practice
Summary Classification Model for Architecture Landscapes

Quoted from The TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition


2. Enterprise Strategic Architecture | Why: Why We Do It

Example Strategic Themes

  • Ensuring profitability in the EV era
  • Embedding profit at the design stage (target costing)
  • Synchronizing global supply-demand and cost

Positioning

Defines enterprise-wide long-term vision and strategy.
Clarifies the “Why.”

Key Components

  • Business strategy
  • Digital strategy
  • Enterprise KPIs / North Star
  • Target Operating Model (TOM)
  • Principles and governance

Relationship with Agile

This layer does not directly translate into sprints, but it defines all prioritization criteria.

Practical Example (Manufacturing / SAP)

  • “Enable real-time global supply-demand integration”
  • “Integrate PLM and ERP to enhance target costing”
    → These are decomposed into Segment and Capability layers

Key Takeaway

Do not leave strategy abstract.
It must be defined in a way that allows decomposition into capabilities.


3. Segment Architecture | Where: Where It Applies

Positioning

Defines architecture at the business domain or organizational level.
Clarifies the “Where.”

Example Segments

  • Supply Chain Planning
  • Procurement
  • Manufacturing
  • Finance
  • PLM

Key Components

  • Business processes
  • Application landscape
  • Data flows
  • Organizational responsibilities

Relationship with Agile

Defines boundaries for:

  • Teams
  • Products
  • Backlog classification

Example

  • “Target Costing Product”
  • “Supply-Demand Planning Product”

Practical Decomposition

PLM Segment

  • Product planning
  • Design
  • Cost estimation

SCM Segment

  • Demand planning
  • Supply planning
  • Inventory management

Finance Segment

  • Cost management
  • Profitability analysis

Each segment is further decomposed into Capabilities.

Key Takeaway

This is not the same as SAP module decomposition.

❌ Incorrect:

  • SD / MM / PP

✅ Correct:

  • Order-to-Cash (O2C)
  • Source-to-Pay (S2P)

Focus on business value streams, not system modules.


4. Capability Architecture | What: What to Deliver

Positioning

Defines architecture at the business capability level.
Clarifies the “What.”

This is the most critical layer directly connected to Agile execution.

Key Components

  • Business capabilities
  • Functional decomposition
  • Services / APIs
  • Data ownership

Relationship with Agile

Forms the starting point of the backlog:

Capability → Features → User Stories

Practical Example (Supply-Demand Planning)

Capabilities

  • Demand forecasting
  • Supply simulation
  • Constraint-based planning

Features

  • AI demand forecasting
  • Scenario comparison
  • Available-to-Promise (ATP)

User Story

  • “I want demand forecasts to be automatically updated weekly.”

Key Takeaway

Capabilities must be defined in terms of business outcomes, not system functions.

❌ Incorrect:

  • “Run MRP”

✅ Correct:

  • “Optimize supply planning based on demand”

5. Connecting the Three Layers in TOGAF® Agile

(Strategy → Segment → Capability → Sprint)

Step 1: Strategy → Segment

Break down strategic themes into business domains.

Example:

  • “Reduce inventory” → SCM Segment
  • “Ensure profitability at design stage” → PLM Segment

Step 2: Segment → Capability

Decompose business domains into capabilities.

Example:

  • SCM → Supply-Demand Planning
  • PLM → Target Costing

Step 3: Capability → Backlog

Translate capabilities into product modules and features.

Example:

  • Supply-Demand Planning → SAP IBP
  • Target Costing → SAP PLC

Key actions:

  • Prioritize at the capability level
  • Define MVP
  • Align with sprint planning

Step 4: Backlog → Sprint Execution (Reference)

Translate into implementation plans.

Example:

  • PLC configuration
  • Master data setup
  • IBP integration

6. Common Pitfalls in TOGAF® Agile and How to Avoid Them

① Disconnect Between Strategy and Agile

If strategy remains too abstract, it cannot be translated into Agile execution.

Solution:
Decompose strategy down to the capability level and ensure alignment before sprint planning.


② System-Centric Decomposition

Designing based on SAP modules instead of business value.

Solution:
Re-define capabilities based on business requirements.


③ Ambiguous Segments

When segments do not align with business value, team boundaries become unclear.

Solution:
Define segments based on value delivery and organizational accountability.


Conclusion

The essence of TOGAF® Agile is:

“A structured decomposition that enables strategy to flow directly into sprints.”

  • Enterprise Strategic → Why (Direction)
  • Segment → Where (Scope & Ownership)
  • Capability → What (Execution Unit)

And most importantly:

“Capability is the bridge to Agile execution.”

By understanding this structure, organizations can maintain architectural consistency while effectively applying Agile in real-world scenarios.

Please refer to this article for topics related to Enterprise Architecture (EA).
Enterprise Architecture – Insight Arc | SAP, Enterprise Architecture & Supply Chain Strategy


Disclaimer

Parts of this article were developed with reference to generative AI suggestions and were reviewed, refined, and supplemented based on the author’s professional expertise and judgment.


Back to Top

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Insight Arc | SAP, Enterprise Architecture & Supply Chain Strategy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading