Three men discussing what is target costing in automotive industry.
In today’s highly competitive automotive industry, profitability is no longer something that can be “fixed” after production starts.
It must be engineered from the very beginning.
This philosophy is known in Japan as Genka Kikaku — Target Costing.
Rather than treating cost as a result of design, Genka Kikaku treats profit itself as a design parameter.
This article explores:
Target costing is a comprehensive profit management approach applied before mass production, during the early stages of:
Its objective is to simultaneously achieve:
The core formula is simple:
Target Cost = Market Price – Target Profit
This is often called the “subtraction approach.”
Instead of calculating price from cost, companies:
Target costing ensures that profit is never left to chance.
Although its precise origin is difficult to pinpoint, target costing is widely believed to have emerged in Japan in the 1960s, particularly within Toyota.
Historical studies by Patrick Feil and others indicate that Toyota integrated Value Engineering (VE) into cost planning as early as 1963.
Japanese academic publications began referencing Genka Kikaku in the late 1970s.
Later, the concept spread globally as “Target Costing,” becoming a cornerstone of automotive cost engineering.
In essence, target costing represents one of Japan’s most influential management exports.
In earlier decades, many manufacturers followed a simple logic:
Cost + Profit = Price
However, intensifying global competition made this approach unsustainable.
Markets now determine prices.
To survive, manufacturers had to reverse the equation:
Target costing emerged as a strategic response to this reality.
Once production begins, cost reduction opportunities become extremely limited.
Research consistently shows that:
defined during design determine most lifecycle costs.
Therefore, cost management is fundamentally a design discipline, not a factory-floor activity.
This is why target costing is closely linked to Value Engineering.
Target costing is not about cost cutting.
It is about integrated value creation.
Its primary objectives include:
Profit is reserved first.
Costs are engineered afterward.
Products must deliver what customers truly value — no more, no less.
Over-specification leads to wasted cost.
Target costing aims to optimize:
at the same time.
Not sequentially.
Without this balance, companies risk:
In Japan, Genka Kikaku is viewed as:
It emphasizes:
In many Western contexts, target costing is often presented as:
The “target cost” itself is frequently highlighted rather than the broader management system.
The difference is not technical — it is cultural.
Japanese manufacturers rely heavily on:
Engineers, procurement, production, logistics, and service teams work closely together — often in shared physical or virtual spaces.
This “alignment culture” enabled target costing to evolve into a holistic management system.
In contrast, Western organizations tend to operate with clearer role boundaries and accountability structures.
As a result, target costing fits more naturally as a functional tool within engineering and finance.
In today’s automotive environment, companies face:
Under these conditions, reactive cost reduction no longer works.
Only companies that can design profitability upstream will remain competitive.
Target costing is therefore not a legacy concept.
It is a strategic capability.
Target costing is best understood as:
A management system for engineering profitability.
Not a spreadsheet exercise.
Not a cost reduction campaign.
But a cross-functional design discipline that integrates:
Companies that master this discipline gain a structural advantage.
Why Target Costing Is Becoming Critical Again in Automotive
In the next, we will explore:
Why Target Costing is Essential in the Automotive Industry
Microsoft Word – TC History_formatted.doc
Microsoft Word – JAMAR 14.1-Target Costing and RCA-Typeset.docx
Parts of this article were developed with reference to generative AI suggestions and were reviewed, refined, and supplemented based on the author’s professional expertise and judgment.
A hands‑on guide for SAP S/4HANA program managers who want to treat implementation as an…
In complex SAP S/4HANA and RISE with SAP programs, PMs must balance sprint delivery, clean…
This article reframes TOGAF as a scalable EA service for SAP programs, using DPBoK’s four…
A global SAP template will not remain sustainable by agile delivery alone. This article explains…
The MRP4 view in SAP S/4HANA Private Edition is the fine‑tuning dial for manufacturing logic…
A deep dive into how Enterprise Architecture (EA) empowers SAP success through TOGAF’s four key…
View Comments